• About
    • Links to Articles, Academic Papers and Books
  • Market Urbansim Podcast
  • Adam Hengels
  • Stephen Smith
  • Emily Hamilton
  • Jeff Fong
  • Nolan Gray
  • Contact

Market Urbanism

Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up

“Market Urbanism” refers to the synthesis of classical liberal economics and ethics (market), with an appreciation of the urban way of life and its benefits to society (urbanism). We advocate for the emergence of bottom up solutions to urban issues, as opposed to ones imposed from the top down.
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • Economics
  • housing
  • planning
  • Transportation
  • zoning
  • Urban[ism] Legends
  • How to Fight Gentrification

Real CEQA Reform, or Just Another Special Interest Handout?

October 4, 2011 By Stephen Smith

California has, since the ’70s, had some of the strictest environmental laws in the country, but urbanists have recently been frustrated by what are known as CEQA lawsuits, named after the 1970 California Environmental Quality Act that serves as the basis of the challenges. CEQA battles have certainly hindered their fair share of highway and road projects, but they also affect transit and urban infill development, perhaps a perversion of the law’s pro-environmental intent.

Skirmishes over the law have yielded mixed results – transit projects were made more vulnerable by a recent ruling, while affordable housing projects are now less prone to CEQA challenges – but there has recently been talk of more major CEQA reform. State Sen. Alex Padilla was the drafter of recently enacted legislation expediting CEQA lawsuits for entertainment conglomerate AEG Live’s proposed downtown LA Farmers Field NFL stadium, and he also said that the new procedure could help the Westside Subway Extension project. The subway project is being opposed by Beverly Hills School District, partly on the grounds that tunneling will prevent it from building underground parking at Beverly Hills High, and a district spokesman hinted to Streetsblog that it would fight an expedited review for the project.

Sen. Alex Padilla’s statement should give transit and urban infill advocates hope that CEQA may be reined in, though as Robert Cruickshank notes, it’s not at all clear that any transit project, whether it’s the Westside Subway Extension or California’s larger high-speed rail project, will actually benefit from recently passed legislation. Cruickshank does, however, claim that “a precedent has been set,” and he seems optimistic that transit will soon get expedited CEQA reviews.

Richard Mlynarik, a “technical” transit advocate who’s had some less-than-satisfactory experiences with California transit planners, is, as always, less sanguine. In a comment on Robert’s post he writes, in his characteristically colorful style:

Good God you people are making this complicated. This is a way for politically juiced stadium and strip mall developers to get what they want sooner and more profitably. […]

But feel free to believe this has anything to do with [transit-oriented development] and choo choos and Overturning the Oil Paradigm. Your overlords thank you (not in any concrete fashion, but it’s the thought that counts, right?) for your work on their bulldozing shopping malling behalves.

On the one hand, Sen. Padilla’s comments are hopeful. But then again, the bill was clearly intended primarily to support AEG’s stadium project – Gov. Jerry Brown signed a football, not a model train. It wouldn’t be the first time that a law written for one purpose was used for another, but it remains to be seen if this will be anything more than a special interest handout to a politically connected developer.

Tweet

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: by Stephen Smith (Forbes), Environment Tagged With: California, HSR, transit

About Stephen Smith

I graduated Spring 2010 from Georgetown undergrad, with an entirely unrelated and highly regrettable major that might have made a little more sense if I actually wanted to become an international trade lawyer, but which alas seems good for little else.

I still do most of the tweeting for Market Urbanism

Stephen had previously written on urbanism at Forbes.com. Articles Profile; Reason Magazine, and Next City

Market Urbanism Podcast

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Mini review: Vanishing New York, by Jeremiah Moss
  • The Distorting Effects of Transportation Subsidies
  • The Rent is Too High and the Commute is Too Long: We Need Market Urbanism
  • The Progressive Roots of Zoning
  • “Curb Rights” at 20: A Summary and Review
  • High Rents: Are Construction Costs the Culprit?
  • Cities Should Not Design for Autonomous Vehicles
  • Does Density Raise Housing Prices?
  • The “Geographically Constrained Cities” Fantasy
  • The Role for State Preemption of Local Zoning
  • Exempting Suburbia: How suburban sprawl gets special treatment in our tax code
  • old posts
My Tweets

Market Sites Urbanists should check out

  • Cafe Hayek
  • Culture of Congestion
  • Environmental and Urban Economics
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Let A Thousand Nations Bloom
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Mike Munger | Kids Prefer Cheese
  • Neighborhood Effects
  • New Urbs
  • NYU Stern Urbanization Project
  • Peter Gordon's Blog
  • The Beacon
  • ThinkMarkets

Urbanism Sites capitalists should check out

  • Austin Contrarian
  • City Comforts
  • City Notes | Daniel Kay Hertz
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Emergent Urbanism
  • Granola Shotgun
  • Old Urbanist
  • Pedestrian Observations
  • Planetizen Radar
  • Reinventing Parking
  • streetsblog
  • Strong Towns
  • Systemic Failure
  • The Micro Maker
  • The Urbanophile

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 Market Urbanism

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.